Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Barking Dogs in the City: It's Against the Law

I had a little dust-up over the weekend with a neighbor who owns a beagle with the voice box of a Boeing 767 and the result was threats from her husband and a promise that, no, she wouldn't do anything about the incessant howling that was keeping my windows closed and preventing me from using my deck.

After our discussion, her 500-pound husband showed up in my back yard as I was unloading dirt from my truck and continued the conversation with, "Are you the one who was arguing with my wife?" and I said, "That would probably be accurate if your wife is the one with the loud beagle."

"Well," he said,  "we're building a fence for the dog and until then, he's going to bark some."

"You characterize that pained and incessant howl as 'bark some'?" I said. "Generous of you. You already have a fence and the dog's howling because he's tied up and left alone. That's a real good sign of bad ownership."

That pissed him off. "You're the one that called the dog warden on us, ain't you?" he said.

"That'd be me," I countered. "You didn't seem to be around, but the dog sure was and I had company on my deck. We couldn't hear each other talking."

"If you call them again," he said, getting redder and fatter by the minute, "I'm suing for harassment." Interesting concept: liability for reporting a crime.

"We have some pretty crazy ordinances in the city," I said, "but I don't think it's breaking the law to report a public menace and disturbing the peace."

"You just try it," he said.

"I will," I promised. "Next time the dog howls, you'll get a visitor. Now, I think it's time for you to leave." And he did.

Next day, I e-mailed my pal Bill Hackworth, the Roanoke City Attorney and he mediated. I was right, the fat guy was wrong.

Here's the ordinance (with this caveat from Bill, "We do not have an ordinance creating an offense for someone who calls the police to report violations of City ordinances. "):

Sec. 6-11. Public nuisance animal.
(a) A public nuisance animal shall mean and include any animal or animals that:
(1) Is observed to run at large, as defined by section 6-22, two (2) or more times in any six-month period;
(2) Excessively makes disturbing noises including, but not limited to, continued or repeated howling, barking, whining, or other utterances causing unreasonable annoyance, disturbance or discomfort to neighbors or others in close proximity to the premises where the animal is kept or harbored;
(b) No person shall keep, harbor, act as the custodian of or permit to remain in or about any premises occupied by him any public nuisance animal, and violation of this section shall constitute a Class 3 misdemeanor. In addition, any violation of this section is hereby declared a public nuisance, and any person suffering injury or damage therefrom may seek correction, removal or abatement of such public nuisance through appropriate suit in equity. Any public nuisance animal, as defined by subsection (a) of this section, may be impounded. (c) This section shall have no application to dangerous and vicious dogs which are regulated by division 3 of this article.


Sec. 6-26. Barking or howling dogs.


The harboring or keeping of any dog, which by loud, frequent or habitual barking or howling or by other conduct likely to cause annoyance and disturb the peace and quiet of any person or neighborhood, which loud, frequent or habitual barking or howling or other conduct is heard or observed by any animal control officer, other officer or other person, shall be unlawful, and any such dog is hereby declared to be a public nuisance. Any such dog may, after reasonable notice has been given by an animal control officer to the owner of such dog, if known, or upon complaint of any person, if such owner is unknown, be impounded and confined in the city dog pound by an animal control officer or any police officer. 

Sounds clear to me. If you have a barking dog, shut his noisy ass up or you can lose him. And you can probably lose more than that if the offended citizen chooses to make it so.


(Photo: dogbreedinfo.com)

6 comments:

  1. Oh boy, can I sympathize! It's very frustrating dealing with bad dog owners. I swear I left Brooklyn because my neighbor's dog barked constantly and the police wouldn't do anything about it. The only thing worse was the constant thump, thump, thump of the basketball as my newborn tried to sleep! Good luck with your situation...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dan, try a little friendliness...offer the dog a treat every time you see him (with the owners' permission, of course). The little guy will look forward to seeing you and the barking should stop.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Give him a treat and get your hand bitten ... no thanks.

    Gees, I can sympathize with that. It just amazes me that owners of barking dogs don't seem to hear them.

    I have been so lucky out here at Countryside and want it to stay that way.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'd love to have been a fly on the side of the house when you were having these conversations!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I guess that some dog owners are much like parents of little bratty children. They think their little ones are little angels. Having moved to the city several years ago, I too, have a little doggie situation next door. These little doggies, now deemed "The Little Yappy F****ers" are cute, but they bark their asses off when they are on their deck and I am on mine. I'm OK with that, because they can see me...and they don't know me. But what really ticks me off is that they will bark when they are in their own house, and I go outside on my deck. Maybe they are aliens and bark by vibration?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Linda:
    My dog training said that I should give a dog a treat as a reward for doing something I asked of him. I'd try it--as a last resort--but for two challenges: the dog is two yards removed from mine and I'd have to trespass to reward him for barking; his owners and I burned a bridge over the weekend and they're no doubt hoping I went down in the flames. Not pleasant people who'd be my friends under other circumstances. And, boy, would I hate the prospect of having to feed them.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are welcome. If they are critical of individuals, other than me, they must contain your first and last name or they will be taken down.