
This is from the Manchester Guardian's George Monbiot in a recent commentary (remember, this is the British take and they don't really have a dog in this fight):
"Listen to what two former Republican ideologues, David Frum and Mike Lofgren, have been saying. Frum warns that 'conservatives have built a whole alternative knowledge system, with its own facts, its own history, its own laws of economics.' The result is a 'shift to ever more extreme, ever more fantasy-based ideology' which has 'ominous real-world consequences for American society.'
"Lofgren complains that 'the crackpot outliers of two decades ago have become the vital centre today.' The Republican party, with its 'prevailing anti-intellectualism and hostility to science' is appealing to what he calls the 'low-information voter,' [a recent study showed that people who watch Fox News know less than those who watch no news at all] or the 'misinformation voter.'
"While most office-holders probably don’t believe the 'reactionary and paranoid claptrap' they peddle, 'they cynically feed the worst instincts of their fearful and angry low-information political base.'"
So, who's worse here, the ignorant or those who use them?
(Graphic: estergoldberg.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment