Into the Disney cast of Princesses charges Tiana (below), poor thingdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3527a/3527a4326ac7c9255801236de16d536247accb3a" alt=""
In this overprotective, kid-centric culture of ours, I have no explanation for the Princess Phenomenon other than the simple fact that marketing trumps good sense, materialism has more meaning than role models of substance, that spending equals good.
Else, my suspicion is that Walt Disney's princesses, regardless of their race, creed or color would have been laughed outa here as impossibly frivolous and even dangerous stereotypes years ago. But it didn't happen and now our little girls are dressing as a variety of dependent, entitled little beauties whose only goal in life is to be pretty and to marry that guy with the big horse. The sooner the better, so let's get a nice boob job at 13 to enhance--so to speak--our chances, ladies.
Disney's newest profit center ... uh, princess ... breaks ground in that she's African American and stars in "The Princess and the Frog." This is ground I'm wondering if my African bretheren need to have seen broken. Equality is great when what's being sought is desirable. This princess, Tiana, is so hot she gets to have a Brizilian boyfriend, and we have to wonder what are the young African American boys thinking about not qualifying as princes.
I don't know exactly how this story will play out, but it appears to be yet another chapter in the saga of young women--girls--using their "feminine wiles" as they were once called, in order to entrap rich young men so the princesses-in-waiting can get what they deserve: a castle full of clothes and other necessities, a stable of the best Arabian stallions, 100 handmaidens, all the makeup Max Factor can imagine and, well, whatever they want to imagine.
She's a princess. She's pretty. She's entitled. She won the prince and never has to lift a finger--not to mention a brain--again.
So who's responsible for this misplaced emphasis? Marketers? Yes. A society that places far too much value on being pretty and not enough on having something under all that hair besides air? Yes. Mothers? Yes. Fathers? Not so much, in my experience (let me emphasize
in my experience so Betsy Gehman won't call me a "misogynist" again). Grandfathers? Not this one.
I don't know where I'm going with this except to scream fecklessly into the digital netherworld. Nothing I can say or do will change anything. My granddaughter and your child will continue to gather mounds of princess gear at every occasion and when, at some point in the future, she is lying on the shrink's couch lamenting her tortured childhood, not a soul will dare point to a body image created by Disney animators, to values built on a cartoon storyboard, to interests formed by marketers whose only goal is to sell "product," no matter how that's accomplished--even at the cost of the very culture they seek to shape. These are as completely amoral a group of people as it is possible to create.
All this is an exasperating thought, one I had hoped not to have again after George Bush left Washington.